Publications
List refreshed 2026-11-08.
2026
Zhang, X., Wu, H., Shi, L., & Savalei, V. (2026). Model identification made clear: From conceptual foundations to CFA identification rules [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/pqa6y_v1
Siegel, D., Savalei, V., & Rhemtulla, M. (2026). Nested model comparisons between common factors and composites. Psychological Methods, 31(2), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000806
Li, S., & Savalei, V. (2026). Calculating and interpreting maximal reliability in bifactor models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 61(3), 469–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2025.2612035
Zhang, X., Huang, M., Sun, J., & Savalei, V. (2026). Improving the measurement of the Big Five via alternative formats for the BFI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 108(2), 250–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2025.2531187
Higgins, W. C., Savalei, V., Polito, V., & Ross, R. M. (2026). Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test scores demonstrate poor structural properties in nine large non-clinical samples. Assessment, 33(2), 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251328604
2025
Li, S., & Savalei, V. (2025). Evaluating statistical fit of confirmatory bifactor models: Updated recommendations and a review of current practice. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000730
Savalei, V., & Huang, M. (2025). Fit indices are insensitive to multiple minor violations of perfect simple structure in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000718
Rhemtulla, M., & Savalei, V. (2025). Estimated factor scores are not true factor scores. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 60(3), 598–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2024.2444943
2024
Zhang, X., & Savalei, V. (2024). An overview of alternative formats to the Likert format: A comment on Wilson et al. (2022). Psychological Methods, 29(3), 606–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000631
Folk, D. P., & Savalei, V. (2024). Examining the performance of the chi-square difference test when the unrestricted model is slightly misspecified. Behavior Research Methods, 56(7), 6687–6706. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02384-6
Savalei, V., Brace, J. C., & Fouladi, R. T. (2024). We need to change how we compute RMSEA for nested model comparisons in structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 29(3), 480–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000537
2023
Higgins, W. C., Savalei, V., Polito, V., & Ross, R. M. (2023). Validation of the reading the mind in the eyes test requires an interpretable factor model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(52), e2303706120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2303706120
Chen, L., Savalei, V., & Rhemtulla, M. (2023). Pay attention to the ignorable missing data mechanisms! An exploration of their impact on the efficiency of regression coefficients. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 58(6), 1134–1159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2023.2193600
Zhang, X., Zhou, L., & Savalei, V. (2023). Comparing the psychometric properties of a scale across three Likert and three alternative formats: An application to the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 83(4), 649–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644221111402
Zhang, X., & Savalei, V. (2023). New computations for RMSEA and CFI following FIML and TS estimation with missing data. Psychological Methods, 28(2), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000445
2022
Byers‐Heinlein, K., Bergmann, C., & Savalei, V. (2022). Six solutions for more reliable infant research. Infant and Child Development, 31(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2296
Savalei, V., & Rosseel, Y. (2022). Computational options for standard errors and test statistics with incomplete normal and nonnormal data in SEM. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 29(2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2021.1877548
2021
Chen, L., & Savalei, V. (2021). Three sample estimates of fraction of missing information from full information maximum likelihood. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 667802. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.667802
Dunn, E. W., Chen, L., Proulx, J. D. E., Ehrlinger, J. M., & Savalei, V. (2021). Can researchers’ personal characteristics shape their statistical inferences? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(6), 969–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220950522
Savalei, V. (2021). Improving fit indices in structural equation modeling with categorical data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 56(3), 390–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2020.1717922
2020
Chen, L., Savalei, V., & Rhemtulla, M. (2020). Two-stage maximum likelihood approach for item-level missing data in regression. Behavior Research Methods, 52(6), 2306–2323. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01355-x
Normand, S., Mikami, A. Y., Savalei, V., & Guiet, J. (2020). A multiple indicators multiple causes (MIMIC) model of friendship quality and comorbidities in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychological Assessment, 32(7), 698–704. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000824
Zhang, X., & Savalei, V. (2020). Examining the effect of missing data on RMSEA and CFI under normal theory full-information maximum likelihood. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(2), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1642111
2019
Zhang, X., Tse, W. W., & Savalei, V. (2019). Improved properties of the Big Five Inventory and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in the expanded format relative to the Likert format. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1286. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01286
Savalei, V., & Reise, S. P. (2019). Don’t forget the model in your model-based reliability coefficients: A reply to McNeish (2018). Collabra Psychology, 5(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.247
Savalei, V. (2019). A comparison of several approaches for controlling measurement error in small samples. Psychological Methods, 24(3), 352–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000181
2018
Park, J. L., Silveira, M. M., Elliott, M., Savalei, V., & Johnston, C. (2018). Confirmatory factor analysis of the structure of adult ADHD symptoms. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 40(4), 573–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-018-9698-y
Savalei, V. (2018). On the computation of the RMSEA and CFI from the mean-and-variance corrected test statistic with nonnormal data in SEM. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(3), 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1455142
Zhang, X., & Savalei, V. (2018). Investigating the effect of missing data on the population CFI and RMSEA values. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2017.1405787
2017
Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B. A., Wagenmakers, E., Berk, R. A., Bollen, K. A., Brembs, B., Brown, L., Camerer, C. F., Cesarini, D. A., Chambers, C., Clyde, M. A., Cook, T. D., de Boeck, P. A. L., Dienes, Z. P., Dreber, A., Easwaran, K., Efferson, C. M., … Johnson, V. E. (2017). Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z
Savalei, V., & Rhemtulla, M. (2017). Normal theory GLS estimator for missing data: An application to item-level missing data and a comparison to two-stage ML. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 767. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00767
Savalei, V., & Rhemtulla, M. (2017). Normal theory two-stage ML estimator when data are missing at the item level. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 42(4), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998617694880
Brace, J. C., & Savalei, V. (2017). Type I error rates and power of several versions of scaled chi-square difference tests in investigations of measurement invariance. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 467–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000097
2016
Whillans, A. V., Seider, S. C., Chen, L., Dwyer, R., Novick, S., Gramigna, K. J., Mitchell, B. A., Savalei, V., Dickerson, S. S., & Dunn, E. W. (2016). Does volunteering improve well-being? Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 1(1-3), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2016.1273647
Zhang, X., Noor, R., & Savalei, V. (2016). Examining the effect of reverse worded items on the factor structure of the Need for Cognition Scale. PLoS ONE, 11(6), e0157795. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157795
Zhang, X., & Savalei, V. (2016). Bootstrapping confidence intervals for fit indexes in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(3), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2015.1118692
Zhang, X., & Savalei, V. (2016). Improving the factor structure of psychological scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(3), 357–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415596421
Rhemtulla, M., Savalei, V., & Little, T. D. (2016). On the asymptotic relative efficiency of planned missingness designs. Psychometrika, 81(1), 60–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-014-9422-0
2015
Chuang, J., Savalei, V., & Falk, C. F. (2015). Investigation of Type I error rates of three versions of robust chi-square difference tests. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(4), 517–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.938713
Savalei, V., & Dunn, E. W. (2015). Is the call to abandon p-values the red herring of the replicability crisis? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 245. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00245
Savalei, V., Bonett, D. G., & Bentler, P. M. (2015). CFA with binary variables in small samples: A comparison of two methods. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1515. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01515
2014
Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2014). Adjusting incremental fit indices for nonnormality. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49(5), 460–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.933697
Savalei, V., & Falk, C. F. (2014). Recovering substantive factor loadings in the presence of acquiescence bias: A comparison of three approaches. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49(5), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.931800
Savalei, V., & Falk, C. F. (2014). Robust two-stage approach outperforms robust full information maximum likelihood with incomplete nonnormal data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(2), 280–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.882692
Savalei, V. (2014). Understanding robust corrections in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(1), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.824793
Lickel, B. A., Kushlev, K., Savalei, V., Matta, S., & Schmader, T. (2014). Shame and the motivation to change the self. Emotion, 14(6), 1049–1061. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038235
Yuan, K., & Savalei, V. (2014). Consistency, bias and efficiency of the normal-distribution-based MLE: The role of auxiliary variables. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 124, 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2013.11.006
2013
Savalei, V., & Rhemtulla, M. (2013). The performance of robust test statistics with categorical data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66(2), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02049.x
2012
Brosseau-Liard, P. É., Savalei, V., & Li, L. (2012). An investigation of the sample performance of two nonnormality corrections for RMSEA. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(6), 904–930. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.715252
Savalei, V. (2012). The relationship between root mean square error of approximation and model misspecification in confirmatory factor analysis models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(6), 910–932. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412452564
Savalei, V., & Rhemtulla, M. (2012). On obtaining estimates of the fraction of missing information from full information maximum likelihood. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19(3), 477–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2012.687669
Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315
2011
Falk, C. F., & Savalei, V. (2011). The relationship between unstandardized and standardized alpha, true reliability, and the underlying measurement model. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(5), 445–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.594129
Savalei, V. (2011). What to do about zero frequency cells when estimating polychoric correlations. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(2), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.557339
2010
Biesanz, J. C., Falk, C. F., & Savalei, V. (2010). Assessing mediational models: Testing and interval estimation for indirect effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(4), 661–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2010.498292
Savalei, V. (2010). Small sample statistics for incomplete nonnormal data: Extensions of complete data formulae and a Monte Carlo comparison. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17(2), 241–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511003659375
Bentler, P. M., & Savalei, V. (2010). Analysis of correlation structures: Current status and open problems. In S. Kolenikov, L. Thombs, & D. Steinley (Eds.), Recent Methodological Developments in Social Science Statistics (pp. 1–36). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470583333.ch1
Savalei, V., & Bentler, P. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling. In I. Weiner & E. Craighead (Eds.), Corsini’s Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed., pp. 1714–1716). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0953
Savalei, V. (2010). Expected versus observed information in SEM with incomplete normal and nonnormal data. Psychological Methods, 15(4), 352–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020143
2009
Savalei, V., & Yuan, K. (2009). On the model-based bootstrap with missing data: Obtaining a p-value for a test of exact fit. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44(6), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170903333590
Savalei, V., & Bentler, P. M. (2009). A two-stage approach to missing data: Theory and application to auxiliary variables. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008238
2008
Savalei, V. (2008). Is the ML chi-square ever robust to nonnormality? A cautionary note with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701758091
Savalei, V., & Kolenikov, S. (2008). Constrained versus unconstrained estimation in structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 13(2), 150–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.13.2.150
2007
Savalei, V., & Bentler, P. M. (2007). A two-stage ML approach to missing data: Theory and application to auxiliary variables. eScholarship. [link]
2006
Sears, D. O., & Savalei, V. (2006). The political color line in America: Many “Peoples of Color” or Black exceptionalism? Political Psychology, 27(6), 895–924. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00542.x
Savalei, V. (2006). Logistic approximation to the normal: The KL rationale. Psychometrika, 71(4), 763–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-004-1237-y
Kolenikov, S., Bollen, K. A., & Savalei, V. (2006). Specification tests with Heywood cases. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association.
Savalei, V., & Bentler, P. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling. In R. Grover & M. Vriens (Eds.), The Handbook of Marketing Research: Uses, Misuses, and Future Advances (pp. 330–364). Sage.
2005
Savalei, V. (2005). On asymptotic robustness of NT methods with missing data. eScholarship. [link]
Savalei, V., & Bentler, P. M. (2005). A statistically justified pairwise ML method for incomplete nonnormal data: A comparison with direct ML and pairwise ADF. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12(2), 183–214. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1202_1